It's not new(s) to me, but there will always be many for whom signals are new and enigmatic.
I think forking a sub-process and killing it if it doesn't complete before the timeout expires is a simple and effective solution to the problem. Whenever there is a risk of arbitrarily bad code to recover from, encapsulating it in a separate process is, in my experience, very helpful.
In reply to Re: New "safe signals" gotcha?
by ig
in thread New "safe signals" gotcha?
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |