And it gives an error that is more specific (for example, it includes the name of the function) than the generic message returned by the anonymous hash.
Besides, it actually dies, not prints something and then goes on as if nothing happened.
In reply to Re^4: Preferred technique for named subroutine parameters?
by akho
in thread Preferred technique for named subroutine parameters?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |