well the argument in PPP is much stronger, the warning is issued at compile-time !!!
The point of invocation can still be found out in run-time, e.g. with carp like already discused!
But a run-time-error can happen years after you wrote and sold the code ...
Cheers Rolf
In reply to Re^2: Preferred technique for named subroutine parameters?
by LanX
in thread Preferred technique for named subroutine parameters?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |