turnstep wrote:
Please tell us this is not production code being used somewhere. Please?
Unfortunately, I can't tell you that. It is being used. It's in a script that is over 2,000 lines long and does not use strict. I added use strict and an extra 130 lines were added to the error log. As usual, I don't have a lot of time to fix this, and it's called from several different places. My only change at this point was to plug a nasty security that tinman alluded to:
Umm.. a biggie, but I don't think you're untainting any of the file name variables or the param variables that you recieve from the user... so a script kiddie style "rm -rf" hack is possible..
Cheers,
Ovid
Join the Perlmonks Setiathome Group or just click on the the link and check out our stats.
In reply to (Ovid) Re(2): How many bugs can *you* find
by Ovid
in thread How many bugs can *you* find
by Ovid
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |