I would consider it a "neutral" vote so it might be worth including in "x number of votes" info.Making anything of my having passed over the node initially, wouldn't seem right. It might even create a contradictory signal if I later gave it a ++.
I guess you didn't really follow the preceeding discussion. Nobody is proposing counting when somebody defers voting, only when one abjures ever voting upon a node (in order to be shown the node's reputation), a feature that has not been implemented.
- tye
In reply to Re^6: Down-vote Bad, Up-vote Good (defer)
by tye
in thread Down-vote Bad, Up-vote Good
by lostjimmy
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |