IMHO, I like the port-ish p5-Foo using whatever the CPAN distribution name would be. It's an "obvious" mapping ("Hrmm, Foo::Bar should be p5-Foo-Bar on github"), and the prefix distinguishes it as perl (and leaves room for the inevitable p6-Foo reimplementation).
(Which reminds me I should put my at-this-point abandonware modules up on github if I could ever remember what disk had my old CVSROOT on it . . . %)
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
In reply to Re: CPAN Modules on Github -- Naming conventions?
by Fletch
in thread CPAN Modules on Github -- Naming conventions?
by saintmike
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |