The possibility of interested people porting from Perl 5 to Rakudo (aka Perl 6) suggests that saying p5 is better than saying perl or cpan somewhere in the name. (Plus p5 is short. Short is good.) The fact that p5-... looks similar to existing naming conventions suggests to me that this is a good way to name things.
Whether we should get all official and call it a "standard" is another thing entirely. But I'm definitely OK with calling it a "suggestion".
Update: I left out a "p5".
In reply to Re^2: CPAN Modules on Github -- Naming conventions?
by tilly
in thread CPAN Modules on Github -- Naming conventions?
by saintmike
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |