Would you mind explaining that. The two primary reasons you would use a hash here are if the indexes were not numerical or sparsely populated and you wanted to conserve space. Those 'ifs' are assumptions not supported (or refuted) by facts presented by the OP. While I agree that chances are it is a better fit for this data, making such statements to a (presumably) newbie without explanation can lead to cargo culting.
Cheers - L~R
In reply to Re^2: array of arrays
by Limbic~Region
in thread array of arrays
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |