How do you protect perl from special interests without a pumpking?
The number of hackers who have direct commit access to the perl source code repository is fairly limited (and limited to trust-worthy people), so the chances of abuse are rather small. And don't forget that we use a version control system, which makes it rather easy for the next pumpking to revert any potential damage.
Also note that the stable 5.10.* branch still has a pumpking, so we're not entirely leader-less.
I can only hope P5P has enough oversight to bridge the immediate gap.
I'm sure they have. I mean the pumpking is not the only sensible core hacker ;-)
In reply to Re^4: When comment turns into disaster
by moritz
in thread When comment turns into disaster
by Tux
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |