Excellent answer, thankyou.
I agree that scripts *should* use taint, but what if they don't ? A quick search of the bugtraq archives found http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/317234, which to my reading looks like a dodgy old CGI script that would cease to be exploitable if the Perl interpreter had poisoned null countermeasures. Seems like a good thing to me, maybe I will take a stab at writing a patch.
Thanks again
In reply to Re^2: Why do poisoned null attacks still work ?
by pubnoop
in thread Why do poisoned null attacks still work ?
by pubnoop
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |