Does the trainer mean that other comparible languages behave in a differnt way? That is the implication of the question.
I would, personally, not imply something which hasn't been asked, but indeed maybe an even more interesting question would be: Is there ANY modern (i.e. post-C++) language at all which does NOT handle memory allocation automatically? I don't talk about ongoing developments in "old" languages (such as FORTRAN, C or COBOL), or newer ones which for compatibility reason have to carry some burden from an older language (such as C++).
In reply to Re^2: Memory reusability
by rovf
in thread Memory reusability
by abubacker
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |