Sometimes I activate Emacs-Code-Browser to have a more Kommodo/Eclipse-like look and feel.
Plus cperl-mode and sepia and some self-written(!) macros doing text-transformations (mostly wrapping perlcode, because I'm still mostly lost in elisp ;-) + self-written(!) keybindings do what I want.
fly-make-mode and auto expands improve my coding speed dramatically.
Emacs is on every platform, it's free, using gnuclient makes the startup fast as lightning, and it can be used without X in console-mode (e.g. while login with ssh on another machine).
Well there are so many flavors of setting up emacs ... but last time I saw Komodo edit it was for sure much slower than emacs.
Anyway it's difficult to compare different IDEs w/o any specific list of "important features" in a "common language" (i.e. do VI-user understand what I mean with fly-make mode?), such that you risk comparing apples and peaches...
You should start giving us a list of features you consider important with some explanation such that you can get a valid comparison.
Cheers Rolf
PS: A friend pointed me to textmate, which seems very nice but is restricted to MacOs. Looking for emulation of the very strong snippet feature I found yasnippet.el for emacs. 8)
In reply to Re: Komodo 5.1 versus the others. (emacs)
by LanX
in thread Komodo 5.1 versus the others.
by Steve_BZ
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |