I use Visual Studio heavily at work and Komodo somewhat, which reflects the balance between the amount of C++ and the amount of Perl I develop. In most ways Komodo is at least as good as an integrated debugger as VS - better than VS2009 in fact where MS have broken fundamental stuff such as breakpoints!
For the stuff I do at work and where the productivity boost justifies the cost the price of the pro version is not a disincentive. For the Perl programming that I do at home, for which there is no remuneration and the productivity boost is less relevant, the cost of the pro version of Komodo is a complete blocker. The 'personal edition' that was available for Komodo 3.x was great for a my home use and I was responsible for the purchase of three copies - 2 x pro for work and personal for home.
Stability is a good reason to upgrade actually. 5.1 is much more stable, especially during debugging, than 3.x was. It was exactly that issues that drove me to upgrading at work. Actually, now I think about it, it was 3.x I was using. Komodo changed their price structure going to 4 and pissed me off to the extent I held off until well into the 5.x life cycle before upgrading.
In reply to Re^3: Komodo 5.1 versus the others.
by GrandFather
in thread Komodo 5.1 versus the others.
by Steve_BZ
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |