Thanks for your comments marto!
Yes, we know how to authorize suspicious behavior items but it requires 1) knowledge of how to do it and 2) authorization from IT. - and - Yes, Sophos is the king of false positives - according to some comparisons it detects over 10-100x as many false positives as competitors.
The software that I am referencing is getting frequent updates and though we can get the authorizations to do the exceptions, it is a general pain-in-the-rear and makes distribution significantly more difficult. I was hoping for a general solution that doesn't trigger Sophos every time.
My guess is that the Sophos detection may be a result of the way PAR::Packer does a two-step by first unpacking the software and then running the thing it unpacked.
Dave
In reply to Re^2: Sophos hates PAR::Packer!
by skeptical
in thread Sophos hates PAR::Packer!
by skeptical
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |