@spazm it was pulled off long time ago. bad design. need to come up with a better one.
And now a new question: Why was the design bad, what can we learn from it to move forward? I liked the premise of having a reusable component for site scraping, I feel like I'm so often doing one-off design for scraping.
My most recent scrapers have used WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder and HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath. Today I helped a friend put together one with Template::Extract, which was cute but seemed like a step backwards since it generates regexp's instead of using the tree nature of HTML.
Maybe I should add HTML::Selector::XPath to help me generate my XPath expressions. Tuning those is often my biggest pain with an XPath solution. This node and thread has some nice XPath tips: Re: HTML and Xpath.
In reply to Re: What happened to FEAR::API?
by spazm
in thread What happened to FEAR::API?
by spazm
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |