Not any stranger than using x and print together.
Maybe this example is easier for you to "accept" as a use case?
DB<1> sub doit { print "test"; return 1..3} DB<2> x doit() 0 1 1 2 2 3 DB<3> test DB<3> p doit() 123test
As I updated in the OP, when you are using the debugger as a REPL, these inconsistencies are strange enough to care for.
Cheers Rolf
In reply to Re^6: Debugger Bug? (who cares?)
by LanX
in thread Debugger Bug?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |