...can be tortured into passing both the invoking class and method arguments
No torturing required... just omit the arrow :)
#!/usr/bin/perl -wl use strict; package base; sub func { print q{in }, __PACKAGE__, qq{ via $_[0] got $_[1]}; } package derived; our @ISA = qw(base); package main; my $pack = 'derived'; my $foo = 'fu'; $pack->${\qq{${foo}nc}}(42); __END__ in base via derived got 42
Update: When you write
$pack->${\qq{${foo}nc}}->(42);
you're trying to call a subroutine named like what's returned by func() (here 1, the return value of the print) ...
Anyhow, some related food for thought:
#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; *{main::1} = sub { print "1() called with args: @_\n" }; main::1(42); # 1() called with args: 42 main::1->(42); # 1() called with args: 42 1->(42); # 1() called with args: 42 main->${\1}(42); # 1() called with args: main 42 no strict 'refs'; main->${\1}->(42); # 1() called with args: main # 1() called with args: 42
(I particularly like the 1->(42) :)
In reply to Re^4: symbolic reference + inheritance
by almut
in thread symbolic reference + inheritance
by toddfreed
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |