Maybe due to another bugfix? Who knows...
Anyway, IMHO the docs should be updated to be clearer in this respect.
Cheers Rolf
In reply to Re^5: Inlining a "lexically-scoped scalar which has no other references"
by LanX
in thread Inlining a "lexically-scoped scalar which has no other references"
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |