but perhaps only 5% or so would ever describe subtraction as non-communicativeThen one can only wonder what they make of the idea of left- or right-associativity in Operator Precedence and Associativity. (UPDATE: On re-reading, the substitution of ‘communicative’ for ‘commutative’ is quite funny.)
technical or scientific language used to convey a false impression of meaningful technical or scientific contentOr perhaps “unusual-to-domain language used to convey an impression of humour”, a special case of ‘joke’. (If ‘vulgar’ were some technical CS term, then your objection might be appropriate, but I think that's not the case.)
Anyway, much of this thread has been occupied with patches to documentation, and your where/when catch was a good one (it bugged me, too). If you find the language that offensive, and you've got better, then why not submit a patch?
In reply to Re^4: Perl 5.11.0 now available
by JadeNB
in thread Perl 5.11.0 now available
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |