With a signal to noise ratio of 3 to 6 I'd have difficulties in drawing any conclusions from the data. Analytical chemistry uses S/N=3 for the detection limit and S/N=10 as a minimum for quantification. With a S/N of 3 your maxima/minima have an error of 33%. I'd focus on reducing (electrical?) noise before any data is acquired (Optimal A/D range?), but that is most likely not your job.
The next best thing would be oversampling. 16 times oversampling (averaging 16 measurements) should give a 4-fold increase in S/N to a workable 12 to 24.
With the current data set you have to face the uncertanty principle in x (correct frequencies, impeded by averaging) and y (correct amplitudes, improving via averaging).
Classical approaches like derivatives produce too much noise. The only recognisable feature is the steep rise for each pulse. I'd declare a new pulse if the signal had a monotone increase for a certain number of samples and the combined increase has a S/N of at least 3.
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.