The approach I would have taken:

The hypothesis is

Perl cannot be parsed

which is to say

There exists a program for which two instance of the Perl parser produce different output

which is true if

There exists a function call in a program for which two instance of the Perl parser have different prototypes for the named function.

This is actually very simple to prove by example.

However, you tried to prove this by counter-proof. That means you need to disprove the counter-hypothesis

For every function call in every program, every instance of the Perl parser will have the same prototype for the named function.

No problem there either. This can be disprove with the same example.

In reply to Re: Perl is not Dynamically Parseable by ikegami
in thread Perl is not Dynamically Parseable by Jeffrey Kegler

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.