Please don't misquote me. I never said that a Moose-based CGIP was out of the question. I said a non-prototype-Moose base class would not be acceptable.Yes, that's right. I was typing in a hurry and made an overly general statement. My apology.
All you have to do is use a prototype-Moose base class, which either exists already, or is just a small matter of programming.I would rather lean on standard Moose
Or, you can go off and do what you want. Just don't call it CGI::Prototype until it's prototype-based.
In reply to Re^2: a Moose CGIP shall not receive merlyn's blessing
by metaperl
in thread CGI::Prototype leverages objects for web app control
by metaperl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |