I adore you, stvn, and this isn't directed at Moose in particular. Just a good example and timing. I want to go on the record (probably should have saved this for a meditation) with this idea: IRC Considered Harmful.
IRCs are knowledge holes even when they are archived and searchable which many (most?) are not. The signal to noise ratio is too high to make them fun or effective to search even when you can; bad answers mixed with good; hacks mixed with best practice; sigils and stopwords galore. Too much intrinsic context; not stateful.
Excellent or important answers and clarifications happen in them all the time without being recorded or refined into a form which would be valuable to more than the two or three users paying attention. IRCs are anti-DRY.
IRCs also nurture clique behavior which can be discouraging to outsiders and would-be contributors even when genial and when it's not friendly it's easy to get away with being a jerk in a chat; it's familiar to the regulars and ephemeral. It's very difficult to get away with it on a mailing list; you often get dogpiled when you try.
I know I'd love to hang around with you personally. I am sad for all the things about MOP or Kioku or DBIC or ... which have zipped through the IRCs without landing in the right™ and "permanent" places: the documentation and tutorials (personal, community, or distributed with the code).
(Sidebar: I will buy you drinks if you're ever in my town. Then we can plumb some real knowledge holes.)
In reply to IRC Considered Harmful
by Your Mother
in thread How to choose the right module
by sans2030
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |