Isn't sub a higher priority than ->? (My noobness and I have no business commenting on such business, so I hope I don't offend anyone).
Welcome to Perlmonks, and feel free to dive right into the discussions without apology. Especially since you took the time to quote from the documentation in support of your answer, no offence was taken (or given).
I was surprised, not by sub {}->() parsing as (sub {})->() (though I had to try it to make sure that it was the case), but rather by tied sub {}->() parsing as ( tied sub {} )->().
In reply to Re^2: tied, or modified?
by JadeNB
in thread tied, or modified?
by JadeNB
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |