You know what. I'd love to see you post an example of a path that reasonably (look it up) justifies the use of a path that requires more that 260 chars.
This brings to mind the Bugatto Veyron. That's a 8-litre, 16 cylinder, 1001 bhp, 256 mph/ 407 kph, $1e6, 2-seater sports car. Technically achievable, but of no practical value at all.
In reply to Re: Filenames beyond 260 chars in Perl on WinXP
by BrowserUk
in thread Filenames beyond 260 chars in Perl on WinXP
by ienne
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |