I've been saying that for years to no effect.
I maintain the code for a context-oriented template language which I use to make web pages and find vastly superior to PHP or "template toolkit" or whatever.
But man, I get kicked for not having objects and inheritance in my template language every time I talk about it publicly.
Will people decry the lack of a "true" object oriented model in Go? Or perhaps would-be naysayers will be swayed by Google's halo?
In reply to Re: Thoughts on "Go"?
by simul
in thread Thoughts on "Go"?
by punkish
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |