Forgive me for criticizing, but I don't think that highlights the change that occurs. Now the docs will have two contradictory statements: one statement will say there are implicit breaks, and this new statement will say there are implicit nexts. I think some readers may get confused and believe that one of them is a typo. I think, something like the following would highlight that a change occurs from implict breaks to implicit nexts:
Inside a for-loop, a when block ends with an implicit next rather than an implicit break.
In reply to Re^4: given-when last time through loop?
by 7stud
in thread given-when last time through loop?
by 7stud
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |