At those rates the differences shown are pretty much meaningless. And I simply don't believe repeat2 - how can wallclock be 0, but the other results identical to repeat?
In reply to Re^3: better (faster) way of writing regexp
by GrandFather
in thread better (faster) way of writing regexp
by jodaka
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |