The tool does not need to recognize all the cases
You seem to have misunderstood me. All that knowledge and all those assumptions is needed for that *one* case.
In reply to Re^5: The maybe it is better written this way tool
by ikegami
in thread The maybe it is better written this way tool
by szabgab
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |