The problem with the picking random (byte) positions, is that with varible length records, longer records have a greater chance of being picked than shorter ones.
But maybe that is negated to some extent because you would be using the next record--which might be longer or shorter--rather than the one picked?
In reply to Re^4: Random sampling a variable length file.
by BrowserUk
in thread Random sampling a variable record-length file.
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |