For starters, it should be (largely) backwards compatible. For instance, the majority of CPAN code (just to take an example) should run without any problems or differences.
I'd call such a language a "next version of Perl 5", not a "next version of Perl". And that's how our points of view differ.
In reply to Re^6: Will Perl 6 Replace Perl 5?
by moritz
in thread Will Perl 6 Replace Perl 5?
by aecooper
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |