In your terminology, that would mean that Perl 2 was the next Perl 1, Perl 3 was the next Perl 2, Perl 4 was the next Perl 3, and Perl 5 was the next Perl 1. Hence, Perl 5 is the next-next-next-next Perl 1.
And then Perl 6 isn't the next-next-next-next-next Perl 1.
In reply to Re^7: Will Perl 6 Replace Perl 5?
by JavaFan
in thread Will Perl 6 Replace Perl 5?
by aecooper
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |