So I'm seeking the opinions from the Perl experts here.
One perl expert I greatly admire is Tom Christiansen. Read his treatise on the subject: Far More Than Everything You've Ever Wanted to Know about Prototypes in Perl.
"Perl's existing ``prototypes'' (...) are really mostly just parameter context templates for implicit coercions"
The only prototype I use now and then is the function prototype "&" - see Re: Perl module for RELAX NG? for an example.
In reply to Re: What's the better Perl style? Define parameters or not?
by shmem
in thread What's the better Perl style? Define parameters or not?
by pureHeart
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |