Off the topic,.I don't understand why "has" doesn't allow shorter syntax - if I write "has x => (is=>rw, isa=>Int, ....)" two thousand times, why can't I declare a subtype or trait or whatever that would be accessible with "has x => mytype"? That's just not perlish, to write too much when you can avoid that :)
In reply to Re^2: Moose roles
by dk
in thread Moose roles
by dk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |