There are some gains to be had from using threads, but not as much as you might hope for. The following are the results of a single threaded test, and a multi-threaded version operating on the same list using 1, 2, 3 & 4 threads:

C:\test>817827 Took 1.622 Odd numbers in list: 4000 Pairs found: 99135 C:\test>817827-t -T=1 Took 1.790000 Odd numbers in list: 4000 Pairs found: 99135 C:\test>817827-t -T=2 Took 1.365000 Odd numbers in list: 4000 Pairs found: 99135 C:\test>817827-t -T=3 Took 1.047500 Odd numbers in list: 4000 Pairs found: 99135 C:\test>817827-t -T=4 Took 0.832500 Odd numbers in list: 4000 Pairs found: 99135

As you can see, the overhead of threading costs you relative to the non-threaded version for the 1-thread case. You make a small gain using two. And further small gains using 3 or 4. At the cost of complexity. The tests were run on a 4-core system.

Note: These are only test apps; the results produced--a single level hash with composite keys--may not suit your purposes.

Non-threaded:

#! perl -slw use strict; use Time::HiRes qw[ time ]; use Data::Dump qw[ pp ]; our $N ||= 4000; our $S ||= 1; srand( $S ); my @list = map 1 | int( rand( 2**32 )), 1 .. $N; my $start = time; my %hash; for my $i ( 0 .. $#list ) { use integer; my $v = $list[ $i ]; ( $v & $_ ) == 1 and undef $hash{ "$i:$_" } for @list[ $i+1 .. $#list ]; } printf "Took %.3f\n", time() - $start; print 'Odd numbers in list: ', scalar @list; print 'Pairs found: ', scalar keys %hash; #<>; pp \%hash;

Threaded

#! perl -slw use strict; use threads; use Time::HiRes qw[ time ]; use Data::Dump qw[ pp ]; $|++; our $N ||= 4000; our $T ||= 4; our $S ||= 1; srand( $S ); my @list = map 1|int( rand( 2**32 ) ), 1 .. $N; my $cStart = 0; my $cSize = int( @list / $T ); my $start = time; my @threads = map { my( $t ) = threads->create( sub{ my( $lo, $hi ) = @_; use integer; my $tid = threads->tid; my @keys; for my $i ( 0 .. $#list ) { my $v = $list[ $i ]; my $start = $i > $lo ? $i+1 : $lo; ( $v & $_ ) == 1 and push @keys, "$i:$_" for @list[ $start + .. $hi ]; } return @keys; }, $cStart, $_<($T) ? $cStart + $cSize + 1 : $#list ); $cStart += $cSize; $t; } 1 .. $T; my %hash; for( @threads ) { my @keys = $_->join; undef $hash{ $_ } for @keys; } printf "Took %.6f\n", time() - $start; print 'Odd numbers in list: ', scalar @list; print 'Pairs found: ', scalar keys %hash; <>; pp \%hash;

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
"I'd rather go naked than blow up my ass"

In reply to Re: How to use my two processors by BrowserUk
in thread Need a faster way to find matches by remzak

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.