I will try removing it and see what I get and let you guys know.
This did cross my mind, but since I invoke setsid() right before the signal handler and since the signal handler works fine before exec(), I determined that setsid shouldn't affect what I am seeing. After exec(), the new process should inherit the same process space as the previous process, and since setsid() didn't prevent SIGINT from being caught in the initial process, I figured it shouldn't affect any subsequent exec()d processes. Am I mistaken here?
In reply to Re^4: signal handling in exec()'d code
by jliv
in thread signal handling in exec()'d code
by jliv
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |