I guess the hardware has moved on a bit in the last 5 years. I also used a file of 100 1000-char (byte) strings.
For my purposes, unicode isn't a concern. Maybe 10 years from now, once we stop penny-pinching over memory with variable length character encodings, and start using straight 32-bit characters universally, it'll be possible to write efficient text-munging code again. Till then, I'll stick with ASCII/iso-whatever unless I'm forced to deal with it.
IMO. The guys that came up with the variable-length encoding should be tried for treason to humanity :)
In reply to Re^4: Does String::LCSS work?
by BrowserUk
in thread Does String::LCSS work?
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |