I understand what it's saying, but I also can understand why it's not readily apparent (especially to a non-native speaker) because I'm having a hard time coming up with a clearer phrasing for it myself :). Maybe "Analogous to @+ for accessing captures via numeric indexes, %+ allows accessing named captures via the name"? If you want to access captures by their index, use @+ and @-; if you want to access (named) captures by name, use %+.
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
In reply to Re^3: Bug in ' perldoc perlvar ' ?
by Fletch
in thread Bug in ' perldoc perlvar ' ?
by linuxer
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |