Blah, <rant>I'm not a fan of these micro-packages that try to save boilerplate, they just add add perldoc lookups when reading code with "Favorite::Boilerplate::Saving::Module::OfTheWeek" and add pointless dependencies.</rant>
Getting back on topic: These modules which enable strict for the caller reduce the number of modules which appear to use strict, which can send the wrong message to/confuse people who are learning perl by reading this code which has strictures enabled but does not advertise the fact by including "use strict"
I can (just) swallow it for Moose (which could probably be a pragma itself anyway), but don't like it in general.
Good Day,
Dean
In reply to Re: Should Test::Most import strict and warnings?
by duelafn
in thread Should Test::Most import strict and warnings?
by Ovid
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |