I'd like your feedback on this article I wrote for the iProgrammer website.
Basically it started out as witting down my notes when I was trying to make a transition from a dynamic language background/Perl to the .NET platform and C#, but then it looked like that it could end up as a full article.
I think that it could assist someone that has a dynamic language background such as Perl and wants to know how dynamic programming works in the .NET platform or for a C# programmer interested in dynamic programming or for the programmer that wants to know how type systems work.
So it could go with any of those two titles :
"A Perl/dynamic language, programmer's view on C# and the .NET platform"
or
"Programming languages' type systems demystified (static vs dynamic and weak vs strong)"
or it could be reversely read as a "C# programmer's look at dynamic programming",
but the title that prevailed was "type systems demystified".
The article talks only on static vs dynamic right now;the weak vs strong is not complete yet.
I am really interested in the forum's opinion and all comments are welcome , positive or negative
Updated link after afoken's suggestion link Type Systems DemystifiedIn reply to Type systems demystified by nikosv
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |