Interesting, even when "there is not much to do" it appears to be slow. I think you have to do some measurements to find out where exactly the bottleneck is. If you execute the query from a SQL client does it take a long time too? One thing I can think of is the overhead introduced by initiating a connection. Does the application initiates a lot of (new) connections or does it reuse connections, i.e. uses connection pooling?
In reply to Re^3: Most efficient MS SQL connection
by dHarry
in thread Most efficient MS SQL connection
by banesong
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |