The Rakudo-ng change was a deliberate decision among Rakudo developers to improve infrastructure code and to make the project stronger in the near term. Not every line of code is fungible; the old code was far from compliance with the standard Perl 6 grammar and -ng is much closer. The old code made certain features difficult to implement; the new code already handles things like laziness and lists much more correctly. The old code was slower; the new code is measurably faster.
The status chart is a little bit misleading as well. It doesn't show the value of the features, nor their difficulty of implementation, nor the particular features you or anyone else needs to use Rakudo * for your own purposes. If the status chart had updates over the past week and a half, you'd also see that test reclamation is a lot faster now than it would have been with the old code.
In short, the -ng changes were deliberate, and if that breaks your heart, you should talk to the developers as a whole in #perl6 on irc.freenode.net for their perspective. (Though I don't recommend you saying "Why did you break things? Aren't you going to miss your goal? Did you ever think of not making changes?")
In reply to Re: rakudo-ng branch
by chromatic
in thread rakudo-ng branch
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |