I see your point. I agree that in a chronological thread model, heavy editing is not warranted.

That raises two follow-up questions:

  1. How should light editing be handled?
  2. If a question would require heavy editing, is it appropriate to repeat the entire question in heavily edited form?

I would propose the following answers:

  1. The original poster should be contacted by private message, pointing out the errors and how to correct them. The original poster should not take offense.
  2. Yes.

The question that remains is how to distinguish these cases.

In reply to Re^4: Grammarians: do we need a new group? by Svante
in thread Grammarians: do we need a new group? by swampyankee

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.