No, I think it's a good idea. But the sample input was well balanced so I used it and included the other in (as you point out, the likely) case it wouldn't fly.
The sample also fails to specially account for the first <div/> which contains the "column" names. We could probably do something automatic with that instead of hard coding the column parsing. The OP might have thought of that already. I didn't until looking it over again now. If I have a few minutes I'll revisit it with that approach.
In reply to Re^3: module for HTML XML conversion
by Your Mother
in thread module for HTML XML conversion
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |