The <company>-perl-Module-Build solution works well for my simple scenario. But I don't think it scales to more than two perl's on one machine. What if I have the system perl (perl-5.8.x), developer perl 1 (perl-5.10) and developer perl 2 (perl 5.12). What is a good way to deal with this? I think taking the RPM naming approach to its logical conclusion means I end up with three packages for the same module, one for each version of perl. Is this what people actually do? I can see the advantage but it seems like a hell of a lot of duplication of effort.
In reply to Re^2: RPM packaging of modules and multiple perl versions
by Anonymous Monk
in thread RPM packaging of modules and multiple perl versions
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |