Several monks actually -- votes that are at certain levels because they feel that the rep has exceeded the actual worth.
<rant>
If this is true, I do not see how this is any different from the personality voting that has been railed against so strenuously. Instead of voting (or ignoring) a node's content, you are voting its Reputation.
If those doing this are against personality voting or would rather see more votes given to code, then I ask them to reconsider this practice. I do not believe it's necessary to "take a monk down a peg" for anything other than a bad node.
Vote the node's content, not the poster nor the node's reputation.
</rant>
--f
In reply to Re: Re: Choose a maximum for Rep
by footpad
in thread Choose a maximum for Rep
by lemming
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |