Memory mapping can be a better choice, if I/O has been identified as a bottleneck and you want 'semi-random' access to you data. I.e. if you can be a bit selective, skipping records, based on the headers and thus skipping significant blocks of data.
For example, the following uses Sys::Mmap:
If you've identified I/O as a bottleneck, it's worthwhile benchmarking this against your above solution anyway, even if you are reading sequentially. It'll help to determine if read really is imposing a performance penalty!#!/usr/bin/perl use common::sense; use Sys::Mmap; my $path = '/tmp/stuff'; my $file_size = -s $path; die "empty or missing file: $path" unless $file_size; open (my $fh, '+<', $path) or die "unable to open $path for read: $!"; mmap(my $data, 0, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, $fh) or die "mmap: $!"; my $pos = 0; while ($pos < $file_size) { my ($size, $code, $ftype) = unpack ("nCC", substr($data, $pos, 4)); $pos += 4; # advance past header $size = $size - 4; if ($size > 0) { $pos += $size; # advance past record } }
In reply to Re: Perl's poor disk IO performance
by snoopy
in thread Perl's poor disk IO performance
by TROGDOR
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |