I did a little searching, and did find a proposal from 2008 about anonymous packages for 5.11/5.12. It doesn't look like anything came from that proposal, though. Whoever originally posted about anonymous packages being a new feature seems to have been misinformed.
In reply to Re: info on anonymous packages in perl-5.12.0 needed
by webfiend
in thread info on anonymous packages in perl-5.12.0 needed
by sergstesh
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |