Yes.
Without knowing the seed or the hashing algorithm, I correctly predicted 99% of the results the first time I ran the program, and I correctly predicted 100% results the second time I ran the program.
The hash was never reseeded since the pathological case was never encountered.
In a more casual sense, the order is unpredictable. It just hasn't been shown to be random. Even if the hash had been reseeded.
In reply to Re^6: Get the order of HTTP request headers
by ikegami
in thread Get the order of HTTP request headers
by arc_of_descent
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |