I might buy that notion, too, except for one thing: In the code we can see, we assign input to $value: transmute it (but not into gold); and abandon it without using it.
I wholeheartedly agree with your recommendation to use CGI or its relatives, but I don't think the code we see is doing any "parsing/decoding CGI" unless useless inconvenience to a whole bunch of electrons satisfies your definition. Rather, I have to go with OP's interpretation: lines 4-8 are useless; a longwinded NoOp; don't do anything useful.
unless the snippet shown somehow misrepresents a bigger picture.
Oops. That's what JavaFan says below, and more succinctly! ++ JavaFan.
Update: Fixed the misquote, "parsing decoding CGI"
And later, clarified para 2.
In reply to Re^2: Need help understanding some code ...
by ww
in thread Need help understanding some code ...
by Perobl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |